How susQR Risk Scoring Works
Transparent methodology — see exactly how we assess QR code safety
Last updated: March 2026 · By the susQR security team
Every QR code scanned through susQR receives a risk score from 0 to 100. This score is calculated by combining multiple independent threat signals — not a single check, but a layered analysis that reduces false positives while catching real threats.
We believe security tools should be transparent. Here's exactly how each factor contributes to the score you see on your results page.
Risk levels
0–14 points
15–39 points
40–69 points
70–100 points
Threat signals we check
1. VirusTotal multi-vendor scanning
We submit each URL to VirusTotal, which checks it against 90+ security vendors including Google Safe Browsing, Kaspersky, Sophos, BitDefender, and more. If any vendor flags the URL as malicious or suspicious, points are added proportionally.
- +25 points per vendor flagging as malicious
- +15 points per vendor flagging as suspicious
- −10 points if widely scanned and clean (lowers score for well-known safe sites)
2. URLhaus threat intelligence
We query the URLhaus database maintained by abuse.ch, which tracks URLs distributing malware. If a URL appears in URLhaus, it's a strong indicator of active threats.
- +40 points if the URL is listed in URLhaus
3. Snort IDS threat detection
URLs are checked against Snort intrusion detection rules that identify known malware, exploits, trojans, command-and-control servers, and other network-level threats.
- +30 points if Snort rules detect known threat signatures
4. Redirect chain analysis
We follow every redirect in the URL chain and analyze each hop. Legitimate sites may redirect once (e.g., HTTP → HTTPS), but phishing sites often use multiple redirects to obscure the final destination.
- +3 points per redirect hop (1+ hops)
- +15 points for excessive redirects (4+ hops)
- Each hop is individually analyzed for threats and security flags
5. Domain analysis
We analyze the domain itself for risk indicators:
- Punycode / internationalized domains (+20 points) — domains using non-ASCII characters to impersonate legitimate sites (e.g., "аpple.com" using Cyrillic 'а')
- IP address URLs (+15 points) — legitimate businesses rarely use raw IP addresses
- HTTP without encryption (+10 points) — no SSL/TLS protection
- Suspicious TLDs (+10 points) — domain extensions commonly used for abuse (.tk, .ml, .xyz, etc.)
- Deep subdomains (+8 points) — 3+ levels of subdomains, often used in phishing
- Typosquatting detection (+20 points) — domains that closely resemble popular brands (e.g., "g00gle.com", "paypa1.com")
6. URL content analysis
- Suspicious keywords (+10 points) — URLs containing words like "login", "verify", "secure", "update-password" in unusual contexts
- URL shorteners (+5 points) — services like bit.ly, t.co that obscure the real destination
7. Clean scan bonus
If the URL passes all checks cleanly — no vendor flags, no threats detected, no suspicious indicators — the score is reduced, reflecting the low risk.
- −10 points for a clean scan across all vendors
Why "Why this score?" matters
Every scan result on susQR now shows a detailed breakdown of which factors contributed to the risk score. We don't just give you a number — we explain exactly why, so you can make an informed decision about whether to visit a link.
Methodology references
- VirusTotal URL Scanner — aggregates results from 90+ security vendors
- URLhaus by abuse.ch — malware URL intelligence feed
- Snort IDS — open-source intrusion detection system
- Punycode detection based on RFC 3492 internationalized domain name encoding